Skip to content
WAWrong ApexFormula 1, explained through data.
CircuitsDriversF1 ExplainedF1 NewsHistoryRace AnalysisTeamsTechnology
Independent F1 analysis
Home›Race Analysis›Practice Analysis›How Much Did Friday Practice Predict Qualifying at Monza in 2024?

Practice Analysis · 4 min

How Much Did Friday Practice Predict Qualifying at Monza in 2024?

A 20-driver FIA timing comparison found a strong Monza rank link, but large individual position swings.

Lando NorrisLewis HamiltonMax VerstappenValtteri BottasMcLarenRed Bull RacingSauberAutodromo Nazionale Monza
DeanPublished 2026-10-05Data checked 2026-10-02
Valtteri Bottas drives the Alfa Romeo C43 at Monza during the 2023 Italian Grand Prix.
Valtteri Bottas at Monza during the 2023 Italian Grand Prix; illustrative circuit imagery, while the comparison below is from 2024. Photograph: Eustace Bagge. Original source Wikimedia Commons file CC BY-SA 4.0 Resized and compressed; no crop.

In this story

Category

Race AnalysisPractice Analysis

Drivers

Lando NorrisLewis HamiltonMax VerstappenValtteri Bottas

Teams

McLarenRed Bull RacingSauber

Circuits

Autodromo Nazionale Monza

Related articles

What Creates an Overtaking Opportunity in Formula 1?What Do DRS, Undercut and Overcut Mean in F1?What Can F1 Telemetry Tell Us About a Lap—and What Can’t It?

At a glance
At the 2024 Italian Grand Prix, FP2 rank and final qualifying rank moved together (Spearman ρ = 0.7489, n = 20), but only 2 drivers kept the same position.

  • Rank correlation0.7489Spearman ρ · 20 paired drivers
  • Top five retained4 / 5FP2 top five also in Q top five
  • Within two places9 / 20FP2 rank to final qualifying rank
  • Mean absolute shift3.30positions across the field

A strong signal, from one weekend

Friday practice is a useful early reference because every driver records a timed lap and the order can be compared directly with Saturday qualifying. At Monza in 2024, the official FIA FP2 classification and final qualifying classification give a complete 20-driver sample. Ranking those two tables produces a Spearman rank correlation of 0.7489: drivers nearer the front in FP2 tended, on this weekend, to qualify nearer the front too.

The result is an association between two session rankings, not a forecast rule. FP2 and qualifying are different sessions with different preparation and run plans. The FIA classification sheets identify position and lap times, but do not record a common fuel load, tyre age, traffic level, or weather state for each lap. This sample therefore cannot isolate what caused a driver’s later position or establish how practice performs across a season.

The front held together more than the midfield

Four of the five fastest FP2 drivers remained in qualifying’s top five. Lando Norris moved from second to first, Oscar Piastri from fourth to second, Charles Leclerc from fifth to fourth, and Carlos Sainz from third to fifth. Lewis Hamilton was the exception in that group: he topped FP2 and qualified sixth. The top end looked stable in aggregate, but exact positions were not.

The overlap narrows farther down the order: seven of the ten drivers in FP2’s top ten also qualified in the top ten. Three drivers outside that Friday group—Verstappen, Perez and Albon—made the Saturday top ten. This is a useful way to read the correlation: the broad front-to-back order carried information, but it did not lock in the final cutoff or resolve who would gain the most.

Only Tsunoda (P16) and Zhou (P20) repeated their FP2 rank. Nine of 20 drivers finished within two places, and average absolute movement was 3.30 positions; five moved at least five. Strong overall correlation did not prevent meaningful individual changes.

Large swings in both directions

Verstappen and Perez each improved seven places (P14/P15 to P7/P8); Albon gained four (P13 to P9). Bottas fell from P11 to P19 and Stroll from P10 to P17. These ranks alone do not reveal setup or strategy causes.

The fastest FP2 lap was Hamilton’s 1:20.738; Norris’s pole lap in Q3 was 1:19.327, a raw difference of 1.411 seconds. That subtraction is not a clean measure of improvement: it compares a practice best with a qualifying lap from another session, without matched fuel, tyre age, traffic, or track state. The ranks are the safer comparison here, and even they describe only this Monza weekend.

The signed chart below shows how far and which direction each driver moved. A positive value means a move toward the front of the qualifying order (FP2 rank minus qualifying rank); a negative value means a move toward the rear. The companion distribution groups the same 20 observations by the size of the move. The full table preserves each driver’s FP2 best lap and both session ranks for checking.

FP2-to-qualifying rank movement at Monza (2024)

Position movement

Positive = gained · negative = lost · zero-centered scale −8 to +8 positions

−8 lost0+8 gained

  1. Lando NorrisFP2 P2 → Qual P1+1 positions
  2. Oscar PiastriFP2 P4 → Qual P2+2 positions
  3. George RussellFP2 P6 → Qual P3+3 positions
  4. Charles LeclercFP2 P5 → Qual P4+1 positions
  5. Carlos SainzFP2 P3 → Qual P5-2 positions
  6. Lewis HamiltonFP2 P1 → Qual P6-5 positions
  7. Max VerstappenFP2 P14 → Qual P7+7 positions
  8. Sergio PerezFP2 P15 → Qual P8+7 positions
  9. Alexander AlbonFP2 P13 → Qual P9+4 positions
  10. Nico HulkenbergFP2 P7 → Qual P10-3 positions
  11. Fernando AlonsoFP2 P9 → Qual P11-2 positions
  12. Daniel RicciardoFP2 P8 → Qual P12-4 positions
  13. Kevin MagnussenFP2 P12 → Qual P13-1 positions
  14. Pierre GaslyFP2 P18 → Qual P14+4 positions
  15. Esteban OconFP2 P19 → Qual P15+4 positions
  16. Yuki TsunodaFP2 P16 → Qual P160 positions
  17. Lance StrollFP2 P10 → Qual P17-7 positions
  18. Franco ColapintoFP2 P17 → Qual P18-1 positions
  19. Valtteri BottasFP2 P11 → Qual P19-8 positions
  20. Zhou GuanyuFP2 P20 → Qual P200 positions

Positive values indicate movement toward the front of the qualifying order; negative values indicate movement toward the rear.

FP2-to-qualifying rank movement at Monza (2024)
FP2-to-qualifying rank movement at Monza (2024)
DriverPosition LabelSigned Position Change
Lando NorrisFP2 P2 → Qual P11
Oscar PiastriFP2 P4 → Qual P22
George RussellFP2 P6 → Qual P33
Charles LeclercFP2 P5 → Qual P41
Carlos SainzFP2 P3 → Qual P5-2
Lewis HamiltonFP2 P1 → Qual P6-5
Max VerstappenFP2 P14 → Qual P77
Sergio PerezFP2 P15 → Qual P87
Alexander AlbonFP2 P13 → Qual P94
Nico HulkenbergFP2 P7 → Qual P10-3
Fernando AlonsoFP2 P9 → Qual P11-2
Daniel RicciardoFP2 P8 → Qual P12-4
Kevin MagnussenFP2 P12 → Qual P13-1
Pierre GaslyFP2 P18 → Qual P144
Esteban OconFP2 P19 → Qual P154
Yuki TsunodaFP2 P16 → Qual P160
Lance StrollFP2 P10 → Qual P17-7
Franco ColapintoFP2 P17 → Qual P18-1
Valtteri BottasFP2 P11 → Qual P19-8
Zhou GuanyuFP2 P20 → Qual P200

How far FP2 rank shifted by qualifying at Monza (n = 20)

Driver Count

drivers out of 20 paired drivers · 2024 Italian Grand Prix

  1. Exact match2
  2. Move 1–2 positions7
  3. Move 3–4 positions6
  4. Move 5+ positions5
How far FP2 rank shifted by qualifying at Monza (n = 20)
How far FP2 rank shifted by qualifying at Monza (n = 20)
Movement BucketDriver Count
Exact match2
Move 1–2 positions7
Move 3–4 positions6
Move 5+ positions5

All 20 paired classifications

2024 Italian Grand Prix: FIA FP2 rank and final qualifying rank. FP2 best lap shown as mm:ss.mmm. Change = FP2 position − qualifying position.
DriverFP2 rankFP2 best lapQualifying rankPosition change
Lando Norris21:20.7411+1
Oscar Piastri41:20.8582+2
George Russell61:21.0863+3
Charles Leclerc51:20.8924+1
Carlos Sainz31:20.8415-2
Lewis Hamilton11:20.7386-5
Max Verstappen141:21.6107+7
Sergio Perez151:21.6788+7
Alexander Albon131:21.5929+4
Nico Hulkenberg71:21.14010-3
Fernando Alonso91:21.31611-2
Daniel Ricciardo81:21.30012-4
Kevin Magnussen121:21.49913-1
Pierre Gasly181:21.81914+4
Esteban Ocon191:21.86715+4
Yuki Tsunoda161:21.73516+0
Lance Stroll101:21.36317-7
Franco Colapinto171:21.78418-1
Valtteri Bottas111:21.46119-8
Zhou Guanyu201:22.22320+0

Sources and method

FIA Documents 18 (FP2) and 48 (final qualifying) pair 20 drivers’ unique ranks. Spearman ρ = 1−6Σd²/[n(n²−1)] = 0.7489, with Σd²=334 and n=20. Mean absolute movement = 66/20 = 3.30 positions; “within two” means ±2. The files do not report per-driver fuel, tyre, traffic or weather. This is one event.

Sources: FIA 2024 Italian Grand Prix, P2 Classification, Document 18; FIA 2024 Italian Grand Prix, Final Qualifying Classification, Document 48. Browse more in Practice Analysis; compare the longer career view in Hamilton’s 2024 teammate results and the history of one-lap performance in Senna’s championship campaigns.

Championship snapshot

Standings

Season 2026 · Round 15

Drivers

Points
  1. 1Kimi AntonelliMercedes302
  2. 2George RussellMercedes236
  3. 3Lewis HamiltonFerrari199
  4. 4Lando NorrisMcLaren186
  5. 5Charles LeclercFerrari179
  6. 6Max VerstappenRed Bull Racing163
  7. 7Oscar PiastriMcLaren120
  8. 8Isack HadjarRed Bull Racing86
  9. 9Liam LawsonRacing Bulls59
  10. 10Pierre GaslyAlpine41

Constructors

Points
  1. 1Mercedes538
  2. 2Ferrari378
  3. 3McLaren306
  4. 4Red Bull Racing263
  5. 5Racing Bulls83
  6. 6Alpine68
  7. 7Haas F1 Team27
  8. 8Audi17
  9. 9Williams12
  10. 10Aston Martin3

Snapshot: 2026-09-30 01:26 UTC

Driver standings sourceConstructor standings source

Dated snapshot; not a live timing feed.

Keep reading

Related stories

Overtaking & Racing

What Creates an Overtaking Opportunity in Formula 1?

Baku’s 2024 race shows why a net gain in positions is different from an on-track pass count—and why DRS zones alone cannot measure overtaking.

F1 Terminology

What Do DRS, Undercut and Overcut Mean in F1?

A practical guide to the strategy words heard on race day and the lap-by-lap mechanisms behind them.

Telemetry & Data

What Can F1 Telemetry Tell Us About a Lap—and What Can’t It?

A source-based guide to interpreting published F1 telemetry without mistaking one lap comparison for a complete engineering record.

Wrong Apex

Formula 1, explained through data. Dated snapshots, sourced methods, and original analysis.

BrowseDriversHistoryRace analysis
Editorial note

Wrong Apex Editorial Desk. Sources and calculation notes accompany each data graphic.